Content deleted Content added
Hogweard (motung | forðunga)
→‎Eye of Odin: what are the ang.wikipedia notability rules?
Líne 382:
:When writing it, I felt its notability lies within its story of cultural preservation. Topics on this Wiki, naturally, will be more obscure as compared to That One Major Wiki, but perhaps "subject-related qualification" lets it slide though. [[File:Flag_of_Virginia.svg|22px]] '''[[User:Wōdenhelm|Wodenhelm]]''' ([[User talk:Wōdenhelm|Ȝesprec]]) [[File:Confederate_Rebel_Flag.svg|22px]] 03:01, 26 Mǣdmōnaþ 2014 (UTC)
::I agree. I'd just like to bulk it up and reference it. [[User:Hogweard|Hogweard]] ([[User talk:Hogweard|talk]]) 12:52, 26 Mǣdmōnaþ 2014 (UTC)
You've stated that [https://ang.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eye_of_Odin&diff=180329&oldid=180327 ang.wikipedia notability works differently to en.wikipedia]. Fair enough, but what criteria/rules does ang.wikipedia use, if any? Your argument is currently no different from "because I say so". Personally I'd have thought that seeing as you are the author of the article you have a big conflict of interest in deciding whether or not it is deleted. Do conflict of interest guidelines apply here? Cheers. [[User:Delusion23|Delusion23]] ([[User talk:Delusion23|talk]]) 20:02, 26 Mǣdmōnaþ 2014 (UTC)