Wōdenhelm
Joined 22 Solmonaþ 2007
Content deleted Content added
Delusion23 (motung | forðunga) →Eye of Odin: what are the ang.wikipedia notability rules? |
|||
Líne 383:
::I agree. I'd just like to bulk it up and reference it. [[User:Hogweard|Hogweard]] ([[User talk:Hogweard|talk]]) 12:52, 26 Mǣdmōnaþ 2014 (UTC)
You've stated that [https://ang.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Eye_of_Odin&diff=180329&oldid=180327 ang.wikipedia notability works differently to en.wikipedia]. Fair enough, but what criteria/rules does ang.wikipedia use, if any? Your argument is currently no different from "because I say so". Personally I'd have thought that seeing as you are the author of the article you have a big conflict of interest in deciding whether or not it is deleted. Do conflict of interest guidelines apply here? Cheers. [[User:Delusion23|Delusion23]] ([[User talk:Delusion23|talk]]) 20:02, 26 Mǣdmōnaþ 2014 (UTC)
:I'm agreeing with Wodenhelm on this one, if ''Eye of Odin'' is extant or did what it said it would do, namely being a museum/restaurant themed on Old Norse mythology. '''ang''' is an academic exercise, encouraging the study of Old English and it does this not so much with dry academia but personal interest. The study of Old Norse culture is very relevant to the study of Old English and Anglo-Saxon culture, and if a thing appears to be notable in that context, it is noteworthy. We can in that way take in things deemed too obscure for '''en'''.
:We are small and liberal in our requirements. There must be some limits presumably - we don't have anything really daft like [[en:Category:Bus routes in London|Bus routes in London]] or [[en:List of telephone area name changes in the United Kingdom|Telephone area name changes]] - but otherwise we are constrained only by our imaginations, and the language. [[User:Hogweard|Hogweard]] ([[User talk:Hogweard|talk]]) 23:00, 27 Mǣdmōnaþ 2014 (UTC)
| |||