James~angwiki
Content deleted Content added
Líne 1,077:
But looking back, I can't find 'middóndlic' anywhere in B&T, so I think we can get rid of it. I think my attempt at using that instead of ætbregdendlic was that that was already ablative, which is a different case from instrumental. For 'findendlic' for Old Saxon, there are remnants of the locative in Old Saxon and Old High German, which is why I put that there. Few, but there are remnants. --[[User:James|James]] ([[User talk:James|talk]]) 06:28, 28 Wēodmōnaþ 2014 (UTC)
::Hey,
::It's good that you're finally able to spend time on this again. Hopefully, I'll find some more time to work on ang.wiktionary soon; sadly, I've been a bit busy lately... and it's going to get far worse. Though, if you're bored and want to do something for ang.wiktionary, you could take a look at my [[wikt:User:Espreon|todo list]] for some ideas.
::Could you give me an example or two of remnants of the locative in OS and OHG? I don't think I found anything for OS the last time I went through an OS grammar.
::Also, methinks that you're putting glosses and explanations for new terms right in the source of articles. Nowadays, we put them on the corresponding talkpages (take [[Mōtung:Æppelcyrnel_(wǣpen)]] as a byspel).
::Finally, I think you mixed up the terms for 'accusative' and 'vocative'...
| |||